Prior to the invention of the cybernet the media had a monopoly on information dissemination, and what trickled through to the public was at its discretion. Consequently, the public was justified in being ignorant on many issues. The internet has since undermined the media’s stranglehold on information. Because multiple news sources can be accessed in an instant, the omission of an important story will be quickly recognised and the offending news network will look worse because of it.
Despite this fortunate development, “blind” spots exist. Perhaps the easiest of these for the media to explain away are stories which unravel slowly over time. One such story involves a greasy outfit named the Southern Poverty Law Center.
In speaking to the average citizen on the net, it appears the standard impression of the Southern Poverty Law Center is that of a group of selfless, idealistic legal warriors fighting on behalf of the victimised. The media has been implicit in cultivating this view. Despite the insistence of journalists that their existence is crucial because it results in a properly informed public, the media has fucked up to a colossal degree by failing to cast even a cursory look into the organisation. If I were a more cynical man I might arrive at a more cynical conclusion: that the SPLC and the media have had been in bed from the beginning.
I’ll return to the symbiotic relationship between the media and the SPLC later on, but the assholes under the spotlight here are not those in the media, but those in the SPLC. And the honcho asshole is Morris Dees.
Morris Dees, a lawyer, founded the SPLC about half way through the last century. With an insatiable appetite for riches, he sniffed out a lucrative lead in the Ku Klux Klan, whom he sued to the fuckhousen. But as with a tribe whose unrationed hunting leads to the extinction of the species that is its food source, Dees’ frenzied financial feeding meant the Klan’s account left noting to devour. His needed new prey and a new tactic, and the internet provide them to him. His new angle consisted of coaxing elderly Jews with memories of the war into believing the 13-year-old American History X buffs on Stormfront were firing up the gas ovens for a second instalment of the holocaust. In consistently ratcheting up the dread, he saw the safe door open and the grand Jewish bounty glitter before him.
To be continued…..
Person In Profile
Name: Morris Dees
Age: Old (probably dead within 50 to 70 months)
Career: CEO of SPLC empire
Habit: Poverty palace, eblogger and wordpress (looking at blogs to include “hate group” scare portfolio), step-daughter’s room
Interests: Extramarital affairs, seducing scared step-daughter with vibrator, domestic violence
If you are the sort who enjoys being outraged by hate, bigotry, and… you know….whatever, then you’re in for a treat. Prepare to contort your face into a self-righteous sneer, because I have in the jackpot in locating discriminatory villains.
The other night I was hurtling through the vast recesses of the internet when I crashed into a pocket of cyber-menstruation named ‘I HATE MEN’ (you have to google the name, for the link doesn’t work – perhaps because they don’t want others to be able to link to them). It is a site dedicated to conveying the message that men are demons with evil erections and that anything with a vagina has a halo floating over its head. As far as I could make out, it consisted of old ladies and young honeys who were dumped for better young honeys. The anger emanating from these lovely roses was astonishing. They hurt me with their insults; they punctured my soul with their words. It was obvious they sought to inflict maximum pain on me because they used the most brutal torture instrument a woman has at her disposal: her long, boring stories. Some of them even said they were converting to lebsianismz – ordinarily I’d say their chances of succeeding are close to nil, but considering they’ve managed to convince themselves that character trait differences between men and woman are mostly environmental, we shouldn’t underestimate their powers of self-delusion.
Some people might stop me at this point and say that as a white patriarchal oppressor in a heterocentric society of…you know…whatever, I’m not entitled to indulge in a victim complex like other demographics. But I’ve been doing a lot of thinking about this recently. Since there is no biological basis for race, I’ve decided that I am black. Therefore, my victim status immediately rises 50%. And since gender is biologically meaningless I might not even by male. So it is possible I’m a black lesbian; in which case, the stench of my victimhood is as strong as that of a poverty-stricken, 3rd world girl being forced by hedge fund managers to suck the wrinkled dick of Rupert Murdoch.
Now that we have my victim credentials out of the way, and I hope you have your victim caps on at home, too, let’s look at some bile emanating from these bigots so we can get offended:
“I HATE MEN SOOO MUCH IT HURTS!” – OneWomanArmy (February 5th, 2012)
“First of all, I have always been a feminist but I never wanted to be a man-hating feminist. But I am now. I fucking hate men, they’re so selfish and stupid and think they’re entitled to the world” – connoisseur420 (posted on April 4 2012)
It will be interesting to see if they fit the definition of a hate group. Now the definition of ‘hate group’ depends on which fearmongers you listen to. I will go by the definition laid down by the civil rights tycoons at the Southern Poverty Law Center, or at least a few of the practices they associate with hate groups. Demonisation:
“I believe men are the most disgusting creature on earth” – hater1 (February 10th, 2012)
“I’m no longer attracted to men either, because they’re so digusting” – Cnote (April 9th, 2012)
“Men are perverts,they are deceivers,manipulators and the biggest liars” – Ihatemen (posted on April 2, 2012)
“Men are biologically and psychologically inferior” – Blue54 (posted on February 13th, 2012)
Generalisations:
“ALL THEY DO IS USE WOMEN AND MAKE WOMEN FEEL LIKE SHIT .
THEY CONTROL US AND TELL US WHAT TO DO AND WE AGREE AND BELIEVE THEM THEN THEY JUST PISS OFF WITH SOME NEXT GIRL WHEN THEYVE HAD ENOUGH LEAVING US FEELING UGLY AND LIKE SHIT!!!” – sk (posted on April 2 2012)
Violent rhetoric:
“My name is Bleh, and I absolutely HATE men. I want to kick them all in the balls simultaneously.” – Bleh (posted on March 17th, 2012)
Based on the above, I think we would have to conclude they are indeed a hate group.
A common theme by which they seek to legitimize their manophobia over there is pornography, and they spread a lot of misinformation about it. This idea that women are somehow degraded in or by pornography is nonsense. Take the 200 man gang bang, for example. When they asked Jasmine if she enjoyed it, not only did she answer in the affirmative, but she said she’d be willing to do another 50 guys after she wipes herself down. She was even awarded a trophy by Ron Jeremy afterwards (I suspect it wasn’t real gold, but family members seeing it on her mantelpiece won’t know that). Another positive taken from the event of the event was that Houston, a fellow porn actress who was sucking off the strangers before they put their condoms on to bone Jasmine, said she was considering having a crack at Jasmine’s record. Good for her, I say. This is an example of how pornography provided a woman with an opportunity to rise to public prominence and boost her feelings of self-worth through personal achievement.
For anyone who might have the audacity to turn this around and blame the victim by claiming I hate women, you’re wrong. I love women, having a particularly strong affection for those born in the early and mid nineties. But these sort of hateful views have no place in a free, democratic society. This isn’t 1968 anymore. Shave those legs, put some make-up on, and join us in 2012, ladies.
That site again is ‘I HATE MEN’ (inverted commas omitted, of course). Google it.
A blog is typically confined to a single topic or serving a solitary purpose. Even those touching on multiple subjects usually have a fundamental theme linking their posts. This blog will depart from that tradition; it will be a mixed bag of advice, short stories (very short), personal observations, and writings that defy categorisation.
The most important posts, though not necessarily the highest in number, will focus on a disturbing new set of laws being introduced in Western nations. They go by various names, but work toward a similar end: depriving men who’ve left a relationship of their assets as formerly married men are following a divorce.
I realise there are female victims of these laws, too. But since the vast majority of the victims are male, this blog will address men. Nevertheless, women are welcome to read along and comment. Most of the advice will be as beneficial to women worried of being stolen from as it will to men.
Unfortunately, this blog will not be updated as often as I would like due to time constraints.
